by InTrieste
The regional government of Friuli Venezia Giulia has announced plans to explore the creation of a network of public fuel stations under the “Regione Fvg” brand, a proposal that has drawn mixed reactions from local political leaders.
The initiative, announced by Regional Councillor for Environment and Energy Fabio Scoccimarro, is intended to provide citizens with alternative fueling options and support services in areas that may not be commercially viable for private operators.
Claudio Giacomelli, leader of the Brothers of Italy group in the regional council, urged a balanced view of the project. He highlighted potential benefits for consumers and businesses, including services for recreational boating along the regional coastline, particularly in Trieste, where he said fuel access is limited.
Antonio Calligaris, head of the Lega group, described the plan as “important and innovative.” He noted that while a small number of public stations might not influence national fuel prices, they could ensure access in areas underserved by the private market. Calligaris added that the stations could serve as testing grounds for energy transition initiatives and allow the region, through Fvg Energia, to provide services that are not yet widely available.
Diego Bernardis, regional councillor and former mayor of Dolegna near the Slovenian border, expressed cautious optimism. He suggested that the project could encourage the adoption of alternative fuels and help stabilize prices, particularly in border areas where fuel costs tend to be higher. Bernardis emphasized that the regional network should complement rather than compete with private operators.
Opposition parties, however, voiced strong criticism. Massimo Morettuzzo, secretary and regional councillor for Patto per l’Autonomia, described the proposal as “worrisome” and an example of the regional government overreaching into areas outside its typical mandate. He urged the administration to focus instead on investments in public transportation, energy efficiency, and sustainable infrastructure.
Furio Honsell of Open also opposed the plan, arguing that current regional incentives, which cost roughly €60 million annually, would be better spent improving public transport. Honsell criticized the incentives for disproportionately benefiting high fuel consumers rather than promoting sustainability.
The debate highlights broader tensions in the region over public intervention in the energy sector, balancing innovation and public service with concerns about market competition and fiscal priorities.
